linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2] UBI: UBIVIS (aka checkpointing) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 14:26:43 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, tim.bird@...sony.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] UBI: UBIVIS (aka checkpointing) support

On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 12:49 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 11.05.2012 12:46, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 10:33 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> First of all, yes it's fully backward-compatible. It uses two new internal volume IDs
> >> with compat = UBI_COMPAT_DELETE.
> >> Old UBI implementations will delete the checkpoint and continue with scanning...
> > 
> > OK. BTW, these patches do not compile when the fastmap is disabled. I
> > hope you'll just kill the ifdefs in the next revision and this problem
> > will go away.
> 
> It builds fine here with CONFIG_MTD_UBI_CHECKPOINT=n.
> What error do you get?

If you are going to kill the ifdefs anyway, I won't spend time on this.
I have several defconfigs with different combinations of the UBI
configuration options, probably one of them did not build. Or may be I
made a mistake.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)