| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201205112230.EED65669.tQOVFMSOFOFHJL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:30:08 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, kyle@...artin.ca,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] Crypto keys and module signing [ver #4]
+static int pgp_calc_pkey_keyid(struct shash_desc *digest,
+ struct pgp_parse_pubkey *pgp,
+ struct public_key *key)
+{
+ unsigned nb[ARRAY_SIZE(key->mpi)];
+ unsigned nn[ARRAY_SIZE(key->mpi)];
+ unsigned n;
+ u8 *pp[ARRAY_SIZE(key->mpi)];
+ u32 a32;
+ int npkey = key->algo->n_pub_mpi;
+ int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ kenter("");
+
+ n = (pgp->version < PGP_KEY_VERSION_4) ? 8 : 6;
+ for (i = 0; i < npkey; i++) {
+ nb[i] = mpi_get_nbits(key->mpi[i]);
Is key->algo->n_pub_mpi < ARRAY_SIZE(key->mpi) guaranteed?
+ pp[i] = mpi_get_buffer(key->mpi[i], nn + i, NULL);
+ if (!pp[i])
+ goto error;
+ n += 2 + nn[i];
+ }
+
+ digest_putc(digest, 0x99); /* ctb */
+ digest_putc(digest, n >> 8); /* 16-bit header length */
+ digest_putc(digest, n);
+ digest_putc(digest, pgp->version);
+
+ a32 = pgp->creation_time;
+ digest_putc(digest, a32 >> 24);
+ digest_putc(digest, a32 >> 16);
+ digest_putc(digest, a32 >> 8);
+ digest_putc(digest, a32 >> 0);
+
+ if (pgp->version < PGP_KEY_VERSION_4) {
+ u16 a16;
+
+ if( pgp->expires_at)
checkpatch.pl
+ a16 = (pgp->expires_at - pgp->creation_time) / 86400UL;
+ else
+ a16 = 0;
+ digest_putc(digest, a16 >> 8);
+ digest_putc(digest, a16 >> 0);
+ }
+
+ digest_putc(digest, pgp->pubkey_algo);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < npkey; i++) {
+ digest_putc(digest, nb[i] >> 8);
+ digest_putc(digest, nb[i]);
+ crypto_shash_update(digest, pp[i], nn[i]);
+ }
+ ret = 0;
+
+error:
+ for (i = 0; i < npkey; i++)
+ kfree(pp[i]);
Stack memory may not be initialized.
+ kleave(" = %d", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+static int pgp_pkey_digest_signature(struct pgp_parse_context *context,
+ enum pgp_packet_tag type,
+ u8 headerlen,
+ const u8 *data,
+ size_t datalen)
+{
+ struct pgp_pkey_sig_digest_context *ctx =
+ container_of(context, struct pgp_pkey_sig_digest_context, pgp);
+ enum pgp_signature_version version;
+ int i;
+
+ kenter(",%u,%u,,%zu", type, headerlen, datalen);
+
+ version = *data;
+ if (version == PGP_SIG_VERSION_3) {
+ /* We just include an excerpt of the metadata from a V3
+ * signature.
+ */
+ crypto_shash_update(&ctx->sig->hash, data + 1, 5);
+ data += sizeof(struct pgp_signature_v3_packet);
+ datalen -= sizeof(struct pgp_signature_v3_packet);
+ } else if (version == PGP_SIG_VERSION_4) {
+ /* We add the whole metadata header and some of the hashed data
+ * for a V4 signature, plus a trailer.
+ */
+ size_t hashedsz, unhashedsz;
+ u8 trailer[6];
+
+ hashedsz = 4 + 2 + (data[4] << 8) + data[5];
Given the (datalen <= 2) check below, can we trust data[4,5] here?
+ crypto_shash_update(&ctx->sig->hash, data, hashedsz);
+
+ trailer[0] = version;
+ trailer[1] = 0xffU;
+ trailer[2] = hashedsz >> 24;
+ trailer[3] = hashedsz >> 16;
+ trailer[4] = hashedsz >> 8;
+ trailer[5] = hashedsz;
+
+ crypto_shash_update(&ctx->sig->hash, trailer, 6);
+ data += hashedsz;
+ datalen -= hashedsz;
+
+ unhashedsz = 2 + (data[0] << 8) + data[1];
+ data += unhashedsz;
+ datalen -= unhashedsz;
+ }
+
+ if (datalen <= 2) {
+ kleave(" = -EBADMSG");
+ return -EBADMSG;
+ }
+static int module_verify_canonicalise(struct module_verify_data *mvdata)
+{
+ const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs = mvdata->sections;
+ unsigned *canonlist, canon, loop, tmp;
+ bool changed;
+
+ canonlist = kmalloc(sizeof(unsigned) * mvdata->nsects * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!canonlist)
+ return -ENOMEM;
Can mvdata->nsects == (UINT_MAX + 1) / (sizeof(unsigned) * 2) due to size_t?
I think we want kmalloc() variant that does not return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists