[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336747350.1017.22.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:42:30 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
emunson@...bm.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC
reserves
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 15:32 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > +extern atomic_t memalloc_socks;
> > > +static inline int sk_memalloc_socks(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return atomic_read(&memalloc_socks);
> > > +}
> >
> > Please change this to be a static branch.
> >
>
> Will do. I renamed memalloc_socks to sk_memalloc_socks, made it a int as
> atomics are unnecessary and I check it directly in a branch instead of a
> static inline. It should be relatively easy for the branch predictor.
David means you to use include/linux/jump_label.h.
static struct static_key sk_memalloc_socks = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
and have your function read:
static inline bool sk_memalloc_socks(void)
{
return static_key_false(&sk_memalloc_socks);
}
which can be modified using:
static_key_slow_inc(&sk_memalloc_socks);
or
static_key_slow_dec(&sk_memalloc_socks);
This magic goo turns the branch into self-modifying code such that the
branch is an unconditional jump at runtime.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists