linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/29] slub: always get the cache from its page in kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FAD585A.4070007@parallels.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 15:20:10 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/29] slub: always get the cache from its page in
 kfree

On 05/11/2012 03:17 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> On 05/11/2012 03:06 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Adding a VM_BUG_ON may be useful to make sure that kmem_cache_free is
>>>>> always passed the correct slab cache.
>>>>
>>>> Well, problem is , it isn't always passed the "correct" slab cache.
>>>> At least not after this series, since we'll have child caches associated
>>>> with
>>>> the main cache.
>>>>
>>>> So we'll pass, for instance, kmem_cache_free(dentry_cache...), but will in
>>>> fact free from the memcg copy of the dentry cache.
>>>
>>> Urg. But then please only do this for the MEMCG case and add a fat big
>>> warning in kmem_cache_free.
>>
>> I can do that, of course.
>> Another option if you don't oppose, is to add another field in the kmem_cache
>> structure (I tried to keep them at a minimum),
>> to record the parent cache we got created from.
>>
>> Then, it gets trivial to do the following:
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON(page->slab != s&&  page->slab != s->parent_cache);
>
> Sounds ok but I need to catch up on what this whole memcg thing in slab
> allocators should accomplish in order to say something definite.
>
Fair enough.

Thank you in advance for your time reviewing this!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/