[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120511192915.GD3785@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:29:15 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void *
> > there are other users that require a different interface
> > or a more precise abstract API, zsmalloc could then
> > evolve to meet the needs of multiple users. But I think
>
>
> At least, zram is also primary user and it also has such mess although it's not severe than zcache. zram->table[index].handle sometime has real (void*) handle, sometime (struct page*).
Yikes. Yeah that needs to be fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists