lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120511133939.25b5a738.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 13:39:39 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: add kernelcore_max_addr boot option

On Fri, 11 May 2012 13:46:04 +0800
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Current ZONE_MOVABLE (kernelcore=) setting policy with boot option doesn't meet
> our requirement. We need something like kernelcore_max_addr= boot option
> to limit the kernelcore upper address.

Why do you need this?  Please fully describe the requirement/use case.

> The memory with higher address will be migratable(movable) and they
> are easier to be offline(always ready to be offline when the system don't require
> so much memory).
> 
> All kernelcore_max_addr=, kernelcore= and movablecore= can be safely specified
> at the same time(or any 2 of them).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ