[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120511141945.c487e94c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:19:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Han Ying <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] add res_counter_uncharge_until()
On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:47:06 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>
> At killing res_counter which is a child of other counter,
> we need to do
> res_counter_uncharge(child, xxx)
> res_counter_charge(parent, xxx)
>
> This is not atomic and wasting cpu. This patch adds
> res_counter_uncharge_until(). This function's uncharge propagates
> to ancestors until specified res_counter.
>
> res_counter_uncharge_until(child, parent, xxx)
>
> Now, ops is atomic and efficient.
>
> Changelog since v2
> - removed unnecessary lines.
> - Fixed 'From' , this patch comes from his series. Please signed-off-by if good.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Frederic's Signed-off-by: is unavaliable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists