| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbqjofEi-5J+GTMOXFK1VvbXqa6At1fKXCge+5_y6aaRA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:49:27 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add generic pinctrl-simple driver that supports omap2+ padconf On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote: > Also, were you intending pinctrl-simple to actually be the GPIO > controller itself? That'd be another case that one might consider fairly > simple, but then extends to being gpio-simple as well as pinctrl-simple... We have some pinctrl drivers implementing gpiolib too already, and it's unavoidable I think, as some recent discussion about matcing struct gpio_chip and pinctrl GPIO ranges shows. Maybe "-simple" isn't such a good name for this thing. Noone thinks any kind of pin control is simple in any sense of the word anyway :-D Tony, would pinctrl-dt-only.c be a better name perhaps? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists