linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FB0336F.9050600@teksavvy.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 May 2012 18:19:27 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length
 record buffer

On 12-05-13 02:01 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com> wrote:
>>
>> Look in syslog ?
> 
> That usually requires root permission, so it's an extra (annoying)
> step. It also gives all kinds or other mostly irrelevant information
> for a kernel person.
> 
> Besides, according to the same argument, dmesg shouldn't have times
> *at*all*. So the "look in your syslog" is pointless for discussing the
> dmesg timestamp.

It's good for dates.  Not as good for times.
I figure anyone trying to diagnose a kernel issue
already has access to /var/log/ as well.  :)

But it's good as you propose with an option.

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/