[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAFB57C.40906@teksavvy.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 09:22:04 -0400
From: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length
record buffer
On 12-05-12 02:35 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> (b) The one thing I have often wanted is not "after how many seconds
> of boot", but "when". So it would actually be nice if the absolute
> time was converted into local time. The kernel can actually do that,
> so I suspect that the best format for the relative timestamps would
> really be something like
>
> > [May12 11:27] foo
> > [May12 11:28] bar
> > [ +5.077527] zoot
> > [ +10.235225] foo
> > [ +0.002971] bar
> > [May12 11:29] zoot
> > [ +0.003081] foo
>
> because that would be really useful sometimes.
>
> (And no, never mind the year. If you log those things long-term, the
> year will be in the full log, so logging the year in the dmesg is just
> pointless.)
>
> I dunno. The above is what I would have liked to see quite often. I
> look at dmesg, and notice that I had an WARN_ON_ONCE in it, and I have
> no idea when it happened, because the "seconds since boot" is totally
> useless information for me, as I'm too lazy to try to use /proc/uptime
> to calculate what it is.
Look in syslog ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists