[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120514184425.5747f862e369e2f291bfba69@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:44:25 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...escale.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c between commit 2ccaef0520d1 ("dma: imx-sdma: make
channel0 operations atomic") from the slave-dma tree and commit
7560e3f3581e ("dmaengine i.MX SDMA: do not depend on grouped clocks")
from the arm-soc tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index a472a29,fddccae..0000000
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@@ -323,8 -322,9 +323,9 @@@ struct sdma_engine
struct sdma_context_data *context;
dma_addr_t context_phys;
struct dma_device dma_device;
- struct clk *clk;
+ struct clk *clk_ipg;
+ struct clk *clk_ahb;
- struct mutex channel_0_lock;
+ spinlock_t channel_0_lock;
struct sdma_script_start_addrs *script_addrs;
};
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists