linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Fix AFFS race condition.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 12:40:45 +0200
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko 
	<phcoder@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix AFFS race condition.

2012/5/14 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> On Sun 13-05-12 15:44:33, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> AFFS code preallocates several blocks as an optimisation. Unfortunately
>> it's not protected by lock so the same blocks may end up allocated twice.
>> Here is a fix.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@...il.com>
>  The patch looks good to me now. Thanks! You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
>  Al, will you merge this patch through your tree? AFFS does not seem to
> have a maintainer so you are a default fallback...
>
>                                                                Honza
>

I don't know the AFFS code, so only a question. Instead to use a spin
lock, I think we can use a simple mutex. Or is the spin lock
mandatory?

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/