linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] testusb: add path /dev/bus/usb to default search paths for usbfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A062DC8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 10:49:06 +0000
From:	"Du, ChangbinX" <changbinx.du@...el.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
CC:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"mina86@...a86.com" <mina86@...a86.com>,
	"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] testusb: add path /dev/bus/usb to default search paths
 for usbfs


Hello.

On 14-05-2012 10:51, Du, ChangbinX wrote:

> As real device-nodes managed by udev whose nodes lived in /dev/bus/usb 
> are mostly used today, let testusb tool use that directory as one 
> default path make tool be more convenient to use.

> Signed-off-by: Du Changbin<changbinx.du@...el.com>
> ---
>   tools/usb/testusb.c |    6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

> diff --git a/tools/usb/testusb.c b/tools/usb/testusb.c index 
> 6e0f567..c6c839e 100644
> --- a/tools/usb/testusb.c
> +++ b/tools/usb/testusb.c
[...]
> @@ -376,6 +377,11 @@ static const char *usbfs_dir_find(void)
>   		}
>   	} while (++it != end);
>
> +	/* real device-nodes managed by udev */
> +	if (access(udev_usb_path, F_OK) == 0) {
> +		return udev_usb_path;
> +	}

    Why {} with single statement?

Hi, thanks for your tip. It's a code style issue. I will remove {}.

By the way, I don't know how I can do with this case? Resend a new patch? Do I need include discussion message in new patch mail?
And how can I know my patch has be accepted? I am a newbie, could you help me?

Changbin

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/