[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB119CA.2080606@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:42:18 -0500
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] zram: remove comment in Kconfig
On 05/14/2012 03:45 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Exactly speaking, zram should has dependency with
> zsmalloc, not x86. So x86 dependeny check is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig
> index 9d11a4c..ee23a86 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig
> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
> config ZRAM
> tristate "Compressed RAM block device support"
> - # X86 dependency is because zsmalloc uses non-portable pte/tlb
> - # functions
> - depends on BLOCK && SYSFS && X86
> + depends on BLOCK && SYSFS
Two comments here:
1) zram should really depend on ZSMALLOC instead of selecting it
because, as the patch has it, zram could be selected on an arch that
zsmalloc doesn't support.
2) This change would need to be done in zcache as well.
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists