linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] USB: serial: Changes to conform with checkpatch.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120514155146.GA30390@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 08:51:46 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Ben Minerds <puzzleduck@...il.com>
Cc:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, richard.weinberger@...il.com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] USB: serial: Changes to conform with checkpatch. -
 space before tabs

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:37:00PM +1000, Ben Minerds wrote:
> Removed 53 checkpatch.sh warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Minerds <puzzleduck@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/serial/keyspan.c |  106 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

What tree did you create this patch series against?  I get a ton of fuzz
and rejects against the usb-next branch, which is what it should be
created against.

Care to refresh this patch series against that tree so I can actually
apply it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/