linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120514170412.GA17086@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 20:04:13 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:54:46AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:52:06 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > +		/* Userspace may produce vectors with count greater than
> > +		 * MAX_SKB_FRAGS, so we need to linearize parts of the skb
> > +		 * to let the rest of data to be fit in the frags.
> > +		 */
> Rather than complex partial code, just go through slow path for
> requests with too many frags (or for really small requests).
> Creating mixed skb's seems too easy to get wrong.

I don't object in principle but macvtap has same code
so seems better to stay consistent.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/