linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120514054714.GA20563@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 07:47:14 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next
	tree

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:51:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h between commit e7b7e0c35655
> ("sparc32: drop btfixup for alloc_thread_info_node/free_thread_info")
> from the sparc-next tree and commit f5e10287367d ("task_allocator: Use
> config switches instead of magic defines") from the tip tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

Hi Stephen.

The right fix would be to drop the define _and_ delete the local
implementation of alloc_thread_info_node() as the generic version
can be used.

But if this builds I can always revist this after the merge window,
so no need for you to do more.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/