| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <201205140909294844918@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:09:32 +0800 From: "majianpeng" <majianpeng@...il.com> To: "Gilad Ben-Yossef" <gilad@...yossef.com>, "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux.com> Cc: "linux-mm" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote: > Didn't I already ack this before? > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> > >Yes, you did, but the patch description and title was lacking and >Majianpeng kindly fixed it, hence the re-send, I guess. >I've added Andrew, since he took my original commit that introduces >the bug that this patch by Majianpeng fixes (and also LKML). >This fix really needs to get into 3.4, otherwise we'll be breaking >slub. What's the best way to go about that? >Thanks! >Gilad Sorry for late to relay. I rewrited the comment and resend. I have a question to ask:because the patch fixed by others,for example Christoph Lameter, Gilad. Should I add sogine-off by them in the patch? Thanks all! ------------------ majianpeng 2012-05-14 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists