lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANQmPXj_81NBBrTYCkhUO1k1i4WVu0iHwY1_10wDVOFWCSkvsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 16:34:33 +0800
From:	mou Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP

Hi Vincent

There is no necessary to change the scheduling policy for for a
SPECIFIC work. In case changing the scheduling policy just for this
reason will drop the total performance at all. People know that
desktop scheduler is for interactivity and server scheduler is for
throughput and we are just designing a scheduler for these 2 groups of
task.

All right you may not agree with me at all. However, changing the
policy for a SPECIFIC work is unnecessary. Or it is more better to
share about "how to make a scheduler for yourselves" with people who
don't know how to write a scheduler. :-)

                                                      Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ