linux-kernel - Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 12:28:34 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>
Cc:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	mou Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:17 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> IMO this whole idea about 'server' or 'desktop' schedulers is bunk.

Yeah, its complete shite. Everybody cares about throughput, latency and
power. The exact balance might differ between workloads but those cannot
be split between desktop/server at all. Furthermore, nobody wants one at
all costs to the others.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/