linux-kernel - Re: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 13:11:28 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work

On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 14:27 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks.
> > > 
> > > Going fine so far, but a more convincing final report tomorrow.
> > 
> > Yes, as expected, Peter's patch (+ ,) is good: that load ran four
> > times longer than the longest it managed before without the patch.
> > Just needs Peter's signoff, I think.
> 
> Peter, can I take your patch with Hugh's description w/ your SOB?

Yes, sorry, I meant to queue it up the lockdep tree but got distracted
by other stuff.

If you want it, feel tree to take it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/