[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120515132631.GA26298@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:26:31 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: dannf@...nf.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, resend] x86: enable rtc-efi
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I don't think so - the two drivers could end up manipulating the
> same piece of hardware, without synchronization. rtc-cmos
> really should bail when loaded on an EFI-enabled system.
That's why we're taking the rtc lock.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists