[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB269BF.3090801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:05:43 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: In kernel hibernation, suspend to both
On 05/15/2012 05:29 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 21:47 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> No. That hangs my box.
>>
>> This triggers a bug in workqueues code (essentially the same as the
>> previous patch, except for sys_sync() not being done):
>
> Alan/Srivatsa,
>
> Coming back to the explanation of how this whole thing works, it would
> seem that at the point of image writing all devices are fully functional
> (not just some, as I mistakenly believed). However, the processes are
> supposed to be already frozen, right? Calling suspend_prepare(), which
> will essentially try to freeze the processes and kernel threads, seems
> like the wrong thing to do.
>
> Did you guys mean that we should be calling
> pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE) only here?
>
Exactly! And also arrange for the corresponding PM_POST_SUSPEND notification
to happen at the end of suspend-to-ram stage...
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists