[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120515145316.GF6948@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:53:16 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDD: Check for correct EDD 3.0 length
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:52:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > It is easy to be confused since there are two EDD 3 specs. First is from
> > Phoenix BIOS (linked at the first mail of the thread) and it does not have
> > enough info even for ATA. You can't tell primary ATA controller from secondary.
>
> Yes you can - it's defined by the PCI specification for compatibility
How? ATA device path has only Master/Slave. Interface path has only
bus/slot/function. So given all that in int13_80 how do I know if this
is primary or secondary controller?
T13 added has Channel number in Interface path.
> mappings on hardware of that era. Once you move to newer systems with ATA
> native PCI controllers then you need the 3.0 spec not the Phoenix spec.
>
> Alan
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists