linux-kernel - Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDrZ-tfC81jnxwpB+DCtmxhU+VfoYbtSBr8MkFt+P8JcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 17:05:47 +0200
From:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, smuckle@...cinc.com, khilman@...com,
	Robin.Randhawa@....com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	thebigcorporation@...il.com, venki@...gle.com,
	panto@...oniou-consulting.com, mingo@...e.hu, paul.brett@...el.com,
	pdeschrijver@...dia.com, pjt@...gle.com, efault@....de,
	fweisbec@...il.com, geoff@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linaro-sched-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP

On 15 May 2012 15:00, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:57 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>> Not sure that nobody cares but it's much more that scheduler,
>> load_balance and sched_mc are sensible enough that it's difficult to
>> ensure that a modification will not break everything for someone
>> else.
>
> Thing is, its already broken, there's nothing else to break :-)
>

sched_mc is the only power-aware knob in the current scheduler. It's
far from being perfect but it seems to work on some ARM platform at
least. You mentioned at the scheduler mini-summit that we need a
cleaner replacement and everybody has agreed on that point. Is anybody
working on it yet ? and can we discuss at Plumber's what this
replacement would look like ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/