[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337095985.3515.1.camel@chief-river-32>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 23:33:05 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] block: add a flag to identify PM request
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 10:35 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2012, Lin Ming wrote:
>
> > Add a flag REQ_PM to identify the request is PM related.
> > As an example, modify scsi code to use this flag.
>
> There already is such a flag; you don't need to add one. In fact,
> there already are _two_ such flags, and it would be best to remove one
> of them. In include/linux/blkdev.h:
>
> REQ_TYPE_PM_SUSPEND, /* suspend request */
> REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME, /* resume request */
>
> Apparently they had been used by the old ide driver, but they don't
> seem to be used anywhere now.
IDE code still uses both types and they are used for system
suspend/resume. See generic_ide_suspend and generic_ide_resume.
But we need a flag to check whether it is runtime suspend/resume
request.
>
> Aside from that, this patch seems to be going in the right direction.
>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists