[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB27EC5.70507@ammonit.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:05:25 +0200
From: Steffen Kühn <sk@...onit.com>
To: "ludovic.desroches" <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
CC: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: fix deadlock
Dear Ludovic,
in the meantime I have some new informations about the atmel-mci
deadlock problem: When you write permanently with
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/<device> bs=512
and removing the card you will get almost always a hang up. With
"printk" I have find out that the function "atmci_tasklet_func" doesn't
run anymore in this case.
I would ask you to add card inserting and removing during write and read
in your test cases.
Regards
Steffen
Am 09.05.2012 12:45, schrieb ludovic.desroches:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> Le 05/09/2012 11:23 AM, Steffen Kühn a écrit :
>> solves a deadlock problem which appears when a mmc card is
>> removing and a process is reading from the card at the same time.
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
>> index e94476b..effdc36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
>> @@ -1499,8 +1499,10 @@ static void atmci_tasklet_func(unsigned long priv)
>> }
>>
>> if (!atmci_test_and_clear_pending(host,
>> - EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE))
>> + EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE)) {
>> + host->stop_transfer(host);
>> break;
>> + }
>>
>> atmci_set_completed(host, EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE);
>> prev_state = state = STATE_DATA_BUSY;
>> --
>> 1.7.2.5
>
> Even if it solves your issue, I am not sure about the consequences of
> this fix even if it is working well in your case and with your hardware.
>
> This condition allows to wait for the end of a transfer. The
> EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE flag is set when the dma transfer is complete (or pdc).
> If the transfer is not complete you will ask to stop it. I understand it
> could solve your issue but I am afraid it can also stop a transfer
> before its normal completion.
>
> I am currently working on atmel-mci and the state machine would be
> changed. So I prefer to wait the new atmel-mci version to take this
> patch. I will add your issue to my test cases.
>
>
> By the way, can you give me more details about your issue because I
> can't reproduce it on my side. If I remove the card while a process is
> reading from it, I also have I/O errors but I have no issue to detect a
> new card insertion.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists