[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337099344.13455.9.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:29:04 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: usb-storage: hide errors for five devices
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 08:35 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Of course, an easy way out would be to downgrade both the "Asking for
> > > cache data failed" and the "No Caching mode page present" errors to
> > > notices. But the SCSI people might disagree with that approach.
> >
> > Well, let's see what they say.
>
> What ever happened here, are these 3 patches acceptable, or do they need
> to be reworked or something else?
Nothing happened after Alan's message.
So, currently only the first patch was acceptable (to Alan, that is, but
it touched the SCSI code).
At least, I haven't seen a reply from the SCSI people. Perhaps the best
thing to do is to submit a series of one or two trivial patches that
just downgrade the errors involved to notices. That should lead to
feedback by the SCSI people.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists