[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120515164300.GA20827@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:43:00 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Bcache v13 04/16] Fix ratelimit macro to compile in c99 mode
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:09:00PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ratelimit.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ratelimit.h b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> index e11ccb4..9ad57d3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct ratelimit_state {
> #define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval_init, burst_init) \
> \
> struct ratelimit_state name = { \
> - .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
> + .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_INITIALIZER(name.lock),\
NACK, kernel is not built in c99 mode and using anonymous struct in
struct initializers is an accepted convention.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists