| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120515180105.GA1923@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:01:06 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...tmann.org, gustavo@...ovan.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com Subject: Re: 3.4.0-rc7 regression: bluetooth vs. s2ram On Tue 2012-05-15 15:29:01, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2012, 15:14:57 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > If I suspend without bnep0 active, resume works. > > > > (This has worked before, but "before" may mean 3.2 in this case). > > > > Can someone test/reproduce this? Ideas? > > > > PS: Under normal suspend/resume, I see these warnings in the > > log. Maybe relevant? > > Most likely. Something has introduced a bug that crashes if the controller > over which a bnep is run is getting away. Does it survive a surprise removal > of the BT device while bnep is up? No, it does not. If I turn off hardware radio kill switch, machine dies in the same way. So not just sleep related... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists