| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1337106094.15553.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:21:34 +0200 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net: Use net_<level>_ratelimit On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:13 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> > Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:03:48 +0200 > > > Oops. Yes, please do that, mac80211 doesn't have DEBUG yet > > If you want debugging messages you would turn on dynamic_debug > via sysctl or whatever, not define DEBUG in your sources. > > I don't think we should add yet another interface just to get > KERN_DEBUG in there. But don't you have to do something in the sources to actually get dynamic_debug enabled? I'm concerned this will make mac80211 debugging inconsistent - the normal bits are just printk() still, and the rate-limited bits need some special enabling? That seems odd. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists