linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] slab: dup name string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FB34534.3070306@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2012 10:12:04 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] slab: dup name string

On 05/16/2012 02:04 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
>> index e901a36..91b9c13 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab.c
>> @@ -2118,6 +2118,7 @@ static void __kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
>>   			kfree(l3);
>>   		}
>>   	}
>> +	kfree(cachep->name);
>>   	kmem_cache_free(&cache_cache, cachep);
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -2526,7 +2527,7 @@ kmem_cache_create (const char *name, size_t size, size_t align,
>>   		BUG_ON(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(cachep->slabp_cache));
>>   	}
>>   	cachep->ctor = ctor;
>> -	cachep->name = name;
>> +	cachep->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>>   	if (setup_cpu_cache(cachep, gfp)) {
>>   		__kmem_cache_destroy(cachep);
>
> Couple problems:
>
>   - allocating memory for a string of an unknown, unchecked size, and
>
>   - could potentially return NULL which I suspect will cause problems
>     later.

Well, this is what slub does.

I sent already two patches for it: One removing this from the slub, one 
adding this to the slab.

Right now I am comfortable with this one, because it makes it slightly 
easier in the latest patches of my series.

But note the word: slightest.

I am comfortable with any, provided slub and slab start behaving the same.

So whatever you guys decide between yourselves is fine, provided there 
is a decision.

Thanks for your review, David!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/