[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46f16fd6ce5b041860f31d6670142754d32ebb1f.1337168687.git.mst@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:46:04 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 2/5] x86/bitops: note on __test_and_clear_bit atomicity
__test_and_clear_bit is actually atomic with respect
to the local CPU. Add a note saying that KVM on x86
relies on this behaviour so people don't accidentaly break it.
Also warn not to rely on this in portable code.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 7 +++++++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index c9c70ea..86f3a1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -264,6 +264,13 @@ static inline int test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
* This operation is non-atomic and can be reordered.
* If two examples of this operation race, one can appear to succeed
* but actually fail. You must protect multiple accesses with a lock.
+ *
+ * Note: the operation is performed atomically with respect to
+ * the local CPU, but not other CPUs. Portable code should not
+ * rely on this behaviour.
+ * KVM relies on this behaviour on x86 for modifying memory that is also
+ * accessed from a hypervisor on the same CPU if running in a VM: don't change
+ * this without also updating arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
*/
static inline int __test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists