[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516124851.GA32064@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:51 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging
tree
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:54:15AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi between commit 7cb2e629a240 ("ARM:
> > AT91: Add ADC driver to the at91sam9g20 dtsi") from the staging tree and
> > commit 5b6089cb6f28 ("ARM: at91: add at91sam9260 DT support") from the
> > arm-soc tree.
> >
> > So, I didn't know what to do with this, so I used the arm-soc version of
> > this file (effectively throwing away the staging tree change). Hints,
> > anyone?
>
> I suspect the addition of the adc node should just go into the
> at91sam9260.dtsi file.
So does that mean that the staging tree version is correct? Or that
someone needs to send me a fixup patch here?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists