[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB3AF46.8090309@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 21:44:38 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jeremy@...p.org,
riel@...hat.com, luto@....edu, avi@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, borislav.petkov@....com,
yinghai@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, cpw@....com,
steiner@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...nel.org,
hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
tj@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jmorris@...ei.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yongjie.ren@...el.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/tlb: optimizing flush_tlb_mm
> Now IF you're going to change the tlb interface like this, you're going
> to get to do it for all architectures, along with a sane benchmark to
> show its beneficial to track ranges like this.
>
> But as it stands, people are still questioning the validity of your
> mprotect micro-bench, so no, you don't get to change the tlb interface.
Yes, sure. You are definitely right!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists