linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slub: fix a memory leak in get_partial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAmzW4PWQiKbs+mdnwG18R=iWHLT=4Bwn8iA110PJaKuvG_AQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2012 22:56:50 +0900
From:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: fix a memory leak in get_partial_node()

2012/5/16 Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>:
> <On Tue, 15 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>
>> > In the case which is below,
>> >
>> > 1. acquire slab for cpu partial list
>> > 2. free object to it by remote cpu
>> > 3. page->freelist = t
>> >
>> > then memory leak is occurred.
>>
>> Hmmm... Ok so we cannot assign page->freelist in get_partial_node() for
>> the cpu partial slabs. It must be done in the cmpxchg transition.
>>
>> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>
> Joonsoo, can you please fix up the stable submission format, add
> Christoph's ACK and resend?
>
>                        Pekka

Thanks for comment.
I'm a kernel newbie,
so could you please tell me how to fix up the stable submission format?
I'm eager to fix it up, but I don't know how to.

I read stable_kernel_rules.txt, this article tells me I must note
upstream commit ID.
Above patch is not included in upstream currently, so I can't find
upstream commit ID.
Is 'Acked-by from MAINTAINER' sufficient for submitting to stable-kernel?
Is below format right for stable submission format?


To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>

CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org

[ Upstream commit xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]

Comment is here

Acked-by:
Signed-off-by:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/