[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB3C895.1050508@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:32:37 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf target: Add need_mmap field
On 5/16/12 9:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:45:49PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> If perf doesn't mmap on event (like perf stat), it
>> should not create per-task-per-cpu events. So just
>> use a dummy cpu map to create a per-task event for
>> this case.
>
> Humm, perhaps target.no_mmap is better? I.e. just perf-stat would set
> it.
>
That gets back to the potential double negation Ingo frowns upon (!no_mmap).
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists