[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337184730.4047.21.camel@hp6530s>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 00:12:10 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] block: add queue idle timer
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012, Lin Ming wrote:
>
> > > Lin, you should have more slack timer handling. Look at the blk-timeout
> > > handling of request timeouts for inspiration, and/or the thread that
> > > Jeff also references. Doing a timer add/del for each request put is a no
> > > go.
> >
> > You mentioned how to detect queue idle in the referenced thread:
> >
> > ===
> > So we could probably add an idle timer that is set to some suitable
> > timeout for this and would be added when the queue first goes empty. If
> > new requests come in, just let it simmer and defer checking the state to
> > when it actually fires.
>
> That is basically how the runtime PM timer works, if you use it as I
> described earlier.
>
> > ===
> >
> > What do you mean of "the queue first goes empty"?
>
> When the queue is first created, the timer is started.
>
> Whenever the timer expires, the code checks to see if any requests have
> been processed since the previous expiration. If they have, the timer
> is restarted. If they haven't, you suspend the device.
And the timer is restarted when we resume the device, right?
>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists