[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516202215.GO22985@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:22:15 -0400
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
To: chetan loke <loke.chetan@...il.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: SCSI RAM driver ported to 3.3 kernel for file system and I/O
testing
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:54:06PM -0400, chetan loke wrote:
> I thought that 'scsi_ram_device_thread' has a
> 'wait_event_interruptible' call if it sees that the list is empty. I
> don't see that call that's why the confusion. Either queuecmd or
> kthread will get the lock and so why keep the kthread spinning in that
> while loop if there's nothing to do?
It doesn't spin, it sleeps:
+ spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
+ if (list_empty(&ram_device->commands)) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
+ schedule();
+ continue;
+ }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists