[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516044646.GA340@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:46:46 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mmarek@...e.cz, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the
sparc-next tree
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:57:47PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:44:30 +1000
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in
> > arch/sparc/boot/Makefile between commit 51f19cfa76d7 ("sparc32: drop
> > build time btfixup patching") from the sparc-next tree and commit
> > 95698570510b ("kbuild: refactor final link of sparc32") from the kbuild
> > tree.
> >
> > I have no idea, so I used the version from the sparc-next tree.
> >
> > Sam, can you have a look and work this out, please?
>
> As Sam states in:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/159094/
>
> This patch will conflict badly with a patch in kbuild-next.
>
> The fix is simple - drop all changes from kbuild-next.
>
> :-)
The above comment is true for both arch/sparc/Makefile and
arch/sparc/bot/Makefile.
sparc-next will also conflict with net-next.
net-next add the following line to arch/sparc/Makefile:
+core-y += arch/sparc/net/
The fix is to add this line to the newly introduced
arch/sparc/Kbuild file like this:
obj-y += net/
Sorry for these conflicts but we have been busy in sparc land
this round.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists