linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] kvm: host side for eoi optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120517075637.GY32036@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2012 10:56:37 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] kvm: host side for eoi optimization

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:49:47AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:28:41AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:07:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > This code is reached from kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(), but this function will
> > > > not be called in above scenario.
> > > 
> > > I think I see. So this shall fix it also makes code cleaner
> > > (no -2 hack). Right? kvm_apic_has_interrupt is called correct?
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > > index b4f7013..5a38e34 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > > @@ -1273,8 +1273,12 @@ int kvm_apic_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >  	highest_irr = apic_find_highest_irr(apic);
> > >  	if (highest_irr == -1)
> > >  		return -1;
> > > -	if (((highest_irr & 0xF0) <= apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_PROCPRI)))
> > > -		return -2;
> > > +	/* Detect interrupt nesting and disable EOI optimization */
> > > +	if ((highest_irr & 0xF0) <= apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_PROCPRI)) {
> > > +		if (pv_eoi_enabled(vcpu))
> > > +			pv_eoi_clr_pending(vcpu);
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +	}
> > >  	return highest_irr;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > I do not like it. kvm_apic_has_interrupt() does not suppose to mutate
> > state.
> 
> OK, so let's rename it so it's clear it can mutate state?
> 
It is not about the name, it is about how function is used, and it is
used to check if there is something to deliver. We should clear pv_eoi
during interrupt delivery to apic. May be setting vcpu request bit and
calling pv_eoi_clr_pending() on a guest entry. 

> > > @@ -1306,10 +1310,6 @@ int kvm_get_apic_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >  	int vector = kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu);
> > >  	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> > >  
> > > -	/* Detect interrupt nesting and disable EOI optimization */
> > > -	if (pv_eoi_enabled(vcpu) && vector == -2)
> > > -		pv_eoi_clr_pending(vcpu);
> > > -
> > >  	if (vector < 0)
> > >  		return -1;
> > >  
> > 
> > --
> > 			Gleb.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/