[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120517080651.GC17419@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:06:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: Remove useless 4 bytes of padding from
every event
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > One possibility would be a config symbol to enable the
> > deprecated field (kind of like what we did with compat
> > vdso). Distros that have a new enough powertop can then
> > disable it.
>
> this isn't really about distro kernels; a distro that pushes a
> 3.7 kernel to Fedora 15 might as well do a powertop upgrade..
> the later is much simpler and lighter (the main difference
> between 1.98 and 2.0 is the use of the perfevent library
> anyway)
>
> it's about people who compile their own upstream kernel...
Nor should we waste too much time over these 4 bytes really. Is
the kernel really in such a good shape that we must spend our
time trying to break working apps, over a mostly cosmetic detail
in an ABI which will soon be messed up with our next set up
mistakes anyway? ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists