[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120517091942.GA24355@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:19:42 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@...plusct.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zsmalloc: support zsmalloc to ARM, MIPS, SUPERH
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:06:56PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 05:32 PM, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > One thing you might consider is providing a stubbed definition that wraps
> > to flush_tlb_kernel_range() in the !SMP case, as this will extend your
> > testing coverage for staging considerably.
>
>
> AFAIUC, you mean following as,
>
> ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsinged long start, unsigned log end)
> {
> local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
> }
> #endif
>
Actually I meant the opposite:
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
#define local_flush_tlb_kernel_range flush_tlb_kernel_range
#endif
as the UP case is going to be local already. It's a bit hacky, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists