linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: twl6040-vibra: Update for device tree support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 May 2012 17:59:14 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	"Ujfalusi, Peter" <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: twl6040-vibra: Update for device tree support

"Ujfalusi, Peter" <peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:

>Hi Dmitry,
>
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
><dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>> So in this case why don't you have parent parse all DT data and
>> construct instance of pdata for vibra driver to consume?
>
>If there is a need to change the parameters (add new ones for example)
>for the vibra driver in this way the change in code only need to be
>done in the vibra driver.
>If the MFD core would construct the pdata, in this case I would need
>to modify both the MFD core and vibra driver.
>

Ok, fair enough.

Thanks.


--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/