[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337266310.4281.30.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:51:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86: Support local_flush_tlb_kernel_range
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 17:11 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > @@ -172,4 +172,16 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start,
> > flush_tlb_all();
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start,
> > + unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > + if (cpu_has_invlpg) {
> > + while (start < end) {
> > + __flush_tlb_single(start);
> > + start += PAGE_SIZE;
> > + }
> > + } else
> > + local_flush_tlb();
> > +}
It would be much better if you wait for Alex Shi's patch to mature.
doing the invlpg thing for ranges is not an unconditional win.
Also, does it even work if the range happens to be backed by huge pages?
IIRC we try and do the identity map with large pages wherever possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists