lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:28:12 -0700 From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kai.makisara@...umbus.fi, jeffm@...e.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] st: get rid of scsi_tapes array Ok, understood. On 05/17/2012 12:35 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 20:56 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote: >> st currently allocates an array to store pointers to all of the >> scsi_tape objects. It's used to discover available indexes to use as the >> base for the minor number selection and later to look up scsi_tape >> devices for character devices. >> >> We switch to using an IDR for minor selection and a pointer from >> st_modedef back to scsi_tape for the lookups. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com> >> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com> > > This can't be Reviewed-by either. The signoff chain has to follow the > transmission path of the patch. If you send me Jeff's patches, you have > to add a signoff because you're a direct part of the transmission path. > If Jeff sends me them, then he can give you Reviewed-by because you're > not then in the direct transmission path. (Signoff is supposed to imply > reviewed by anyway, so the tagging is correct in either case). > > James > > > -- Lee Duncan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists