[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB1950C.9000304@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:28:12 -0700
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kai.makisara@...umbus.fi, jeffm@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] st: get rid of scsi_tapes array
Ok, understood.
On 05/17/2012 12:35 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 20:56 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
>> st currently allocates an array to store pointers to all of the
>> scsi_tape objects. It's used to discover available indexes to use as the
>> base for the minor number selection and later to look up scsi_tape
>> devices for character devices.
>>
>> We switch to using an IDR for minor selection and a pointer from
>> st_modedef back to scsi_tape for the lookups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
>
> This can't be Reviewed-by either. The signoff chain has to follow the
> transmission path of the patch. If you send me Jeff's patches, you have
> to add a signoff because you're a direct part of the transmission path.
> If Jeff sends me them, then he can give you Reviewed-by because you're
> not then in the direct transmission path. (Signoff is supposed to imply
> reviewed by anyway, so the tagging is correct in either case).
>
> James
>
>
>
--
Lee Duncan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists