[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120517154755.GG2567@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:47:55 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT] rwsem_rt: Another (more sane) approach to mulit
reader rt locks
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:32:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 08:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Some researchers at MIT RCU-ified this lock:
> >
> > http://people.csail.mit.edu/nickolai/papers/clements-bonsai.pdf
>
> Ah, as have I [1].. and they seem to have gotten about as far as I have,
> which means almost there but not quite [2] :-)
I had forgotten about that -- that was the first call for call_srcu(),
if I remember correctly.
> The most interesting case is file maps and they simply ignored those.
> While I appreciate that from an academic pov, -- they can still write a
> paper on the other interesting bits -- I don't really like it from a
> practical point.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/4/257
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/4/532
Hmmm... Do the recent dcache changes cover some of the things that
Linus called out? Probably not, but some at least.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists