[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB52270.2060505@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:08:16 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, robert.richter@....com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf script: Replace "struct thread" with "struct
addr_location" as a parameter for "process_event()"
On 5/17/12 9:45 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:59:14PM +0800, Feng Tang escreveu:
>> Both perl and python script start processing events other than trace
>> points, and it's useful to pass the resolved symbol and the dso info
>> to the event handler in script for better analysis and statistics.
>>
>> Struct thread is already a member of struct addr_location, using
>> addr_location will keep the thread info, while providing additional
>> symbol and dso info if exist, so that the script itself doesn't need
>> to bother to do the symbol resolving and dso searching work.
>
> This seems ok.
>
> David, any objections or suggestions?
perf_event__preprocess_sample calls thread__find_addr_map which sets
al->thread and the preprocess_sample is invoked prior to process_event,
so it should be fine.
That said, I would like to test it. Unfortunately I am knee deep
debugging some local perf breakage. Give me a couple of days to get back
to this.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists