[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120517172215.GB11487@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:22:15 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/6] arm, mm: Convert arm to generic tlb
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:00:12PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 10:51 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:30:23AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > Another minor thing is that on newer ARM processors (Cortex-A15) we
> > > > need the TLB shootdown even on UP systems, so tlb_fast_mode should
> > > > always return 0. Something like below (untested):
> > >
> > > No Catalin, we need this for virtually all ARMv7 CPUs whether they're UP
> > > or SMP, not just for A15, because of the speculative prefetch which can
> > > re-load TLB entries from the page tables at _any_ time.
> >
> > Hmm,. so this is mostly because of the confusion/coupling between
> > tlb_remove_page() and tlb_remove_table() I guess. Since I don't see the
> > freeing of the actual pages being a problem with speculative TLB
> > reloads, just the page-tables.
> >
> > Should we introduce a tlb_remove_table() regardless of
> > HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE which always queues the tables regardless of
> > tlb_fast_mode()?
>
> BTW, looking at your tlb-unify branch, does tlb_remove_table() call
> tlb_flush/tlb_flush_mmu before freeing the tables? I can only see
> tlb_remove_page() doing this. On ARM, even UP, we need the TLB flushing
> after clearing the pmd and before freeing the pte page table (and
> ideally doing it less often than at every pte_free_tlb() call).
Catalin,
The way TLB shootdown stuff works is that _every_ single bit of memory
which gets freed, whether its a page or a page table, gets added to a
list of pages to be freed.
So, the sequence is:
- remove pte/pmd/pud/pgd pointers
- add pages, whether they be pages pointed to by pte entries or page tables
to be freed to a list
- when list is sufficiently full, invalidate TLBs
- free list of pages
That means the pages will not be freed, whether it be a page mapped
into userspace or a page table until such time that the TLB has been
invalidated.
For page tables, this is done via pXX_free_tlb(), which then calls out
to the arch specific __pXX_free_tlb(), which ultimately then hands the
page table over to tlb_remove_page() to add to the list of to-be-freed
pages.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists