linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1337276960.4970.4.camel@lovely>
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2012 19:49:20 +0200
From:	Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:13 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:56:18AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:22:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the mx35 to the supported cpu-families of the
> > > > "CPUfreq driver for i.MX CPUs".
> > > 
> > > I'm afraid this has to wait another cycle since you are patching a file
> > > that is scheduled to be replaced with common clock framework support.
> > 
> > Has this "scheduled replacement" somewhere (e.g. calendar) been
> > marked? So that I can check in the future before editing "scheduled
> > files".
> 
> The clock framework conversion has been a hot topic for quite a while
> now, but there hasn't been an official note about it outside the list.
> I can understand that the occasional linux arm kernel reader is not
> aware of it, but we currently have nothing in place to anounce such
> things. (Other than feature-removal.txt which seems not very suitable
> since no feature is removed, only updated)

Is there already a version I can rebase the patch?

On your repo at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git I can't
find the new clock framework or even a work-in-progress version.

Thanks,
 -- Christoph

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/